In the game of cricket, a team who batted second and scored significantly fewer runs than the team who batted first may be forced to follow-on Golden dragon online casino. : to take their second innings immediately after their first. The follow-on can be enforced by the team who batted first, and is intended to reduce the probability of a drawn result, by allowing the second team's second innings to be completed sooner.
Sports betting odds at Ladbrokes Sports. View for tips, available match odds, live-results and more. Football, Horse Racing and more! Bet now with Ladbrokes! How it works: Just take a Free Spin for your chance to win a daily prize. Spin it and you could land our BIG WIN of a £100 Cash Prize, or Free Spins and Bonuses! Ready to take part? Where and when: Spin the wheel daily between 09.01 (UK Time) Tuesday 2nd March and 23:59 (UK Time) Sunday 14th March to see if you win. If you are a lucky winner.
Traditional sequence | Follow-on sequence | ||
---|---|---|---|
1. | Team batting first | 1. | Team batting first |
2. | Team batting second | 2. | Team batting second |
3. | Team batting first | 3. | Team batting second |
4. | Team batting second | 4. | Team batting first |
The follow-on occurs only in those forms of cricket where each team normally bats twice: notably in domestic first class cricket and international Test cricket. In these forms of cricket, a team cannot win a match unless at least three innings have been completed. If fewer than three innings are completed by the scheduled end of play, the result of the match can only be a draw.
The decision to enforce the follow-on is made by the captain of the team who batted first, who considers the score, the apparent strength of the two sides, the conditions of weather and the pitch, and the time remaining.
The rules governing the circumstances in which the follow-on may be enforced are found in Law 14 of the Laws of Cricket.
Example[edit]
During the India national cricket team's 2017 tour of Sri Lanka, in the Second Test, India won the toss and batted first. Sri Lanka batted second, failed to score within 200 runs of India's first innings score, and were forced to follow-on. India won the match by an innings and 53 runs.
- India scored 622/9, dec
- Sri Lanka scored 183, all out
- Sri Lanka scored 386, all out
This contrasts with the order of innings batted in the First Test of the same series, where Indian captain Virat Kohli had the right to enforce the follow-on, but declined. India won the match by 304 runs.
- India scored 600
- Sri Lanka scored 291, all out
- India scored 240/3, dec
- Sri Lanka scored 245, all out
Minimum lead[edit]
Law 14 of the Laws of cricket[1] considers the length of the match in defining the minimum lead required for the defending team to enforce the follow-on.
- In a match of five days or more, a side which bats first and leads by at least 200 runs has the option of requiring the other side to follow-on.
- in a match of three or four days, 150 runs;
- in a two-day match, 100;
When the start of a match is delayed by one or more full days, e.g. due to bad weather, the score lead required to enforce the follow-on is reduced accordingly.
However, when a match duration is shortened after it has started, the score lead required to enforce the follow-on remains unchanged.
Enforcement[edit]
The follow-on is not automatic; the captain of the leading team decides whether to enforce it. Conventional theory suggests the follow-on is almost always enforced. In his classic text The Art of Captaincy, Mike Brearley deals with the issue in a single paragraph, and finds the advantages overwhelming.[2]
- The main reason to enforce the follow-on is to prevent a draw. Batting last, the chasing side can bat cautiously and use up time to draw the match rather than lose, and the follow-on gives them more time, making that strategy more difficult.
- Enforcing the follow-on can also increase the pressure on the chasing team, since they have already posted an inferior score, and the state of the pitch often deteriorates as a match progresses.
However, there are several reasons for not enforcing the follow-on.
- Most simply, it is tiring for bowlers to bowl for two consecutive innings, and it can be more difficult to dismiss a team in their second innings than it was in their first innings. During the first test of the 1958 series between Pakistan and West Indies on 17–23 January, West Indies batting first declared at 579/9 and Pakistan replied with 106 runs. Pakistan was asked to follow-on on the third day of the six-day match. Mohammed Hanif held his ground for 970 minutes, scoring 337 runs, forcing a draw.[3]
- Declining to enforce the follow-on reduces the defending team's probability of losing. Already with a substantial lead in the first innings, the defending team can score enough runs and/or use up enough time to give the chasing team no chance of victory. This does increase the probability of a drawn result, but it can also demotivate the chasing team who have nothing to play for.
- It is usually a disadvantage to bat last, when the pitch has deteriorated and favours spin bowling.
In recent years there has perhaps been a trend against enforcing the follow-on in Test cricket. Former England captain Andrew Strauss on several occasions took his second innings straight away. It has, though, had some notable successes, for instance at Lord's in the 2009 Ashes series. Here, Australia were 210 behind on first innings but did not follow on; England batted again, set Australia a highly unlikely victory target of 522, and won the game easily. For their part, Australian captains Steve Waugh and Ricky Ponting were also notably reluctant to enforce the follow-on, although that was perhaps more to do with wanting to allow Shane Warne to bowl on a deteriorating pitch later in the game. Michael Clarke only enforced the follow-on once in his career as a captain (during his final match in the 2015 Ashes), even when holding a substantial first innings lead due to the risk of tiring his fast bowlers.
Victories by sides not made to follow on[edit]
Test matches[edit]
South Africa v Australia, Kingsmead, 1950: In a four-day Test (with one rest day in the middle of the match), South Africa won the toss, chose to bat, and posted 311. The offspinner Hugh Tayfield took 7–23, helping to bundle out Australia for 75, giving South Africa a first-innings lead of 236. South African captain Dudley Nourse elected not to enforce the follow-on owing to forecasts of rain, but in their second innings South Africa folded for 99. Thanks largely to an unbeaten 151 from Neil Harvey, Australia made 336 in 123.6 overs to win by 5 wickets.
First-class matches[edit]
ICC Intercontinental Cup – Afghanistan v Canada, Sharjah, 2010: Canada won the toss and chose to bat, scoring 566 in their first innings and bowling out Afghanistan for 264 in reply, giving Canada a first-innings lead of 302 runs. Wicketkeeper-captain Ashish Bagai, who retired hurt in Canada's second innings, declared with Canada on 191–4 after 40 overs to set Afghanistan a target of 494. The wicketkeeper Mohammad Shahzad made 214* as Afghanistan scored 494–4 to win by 6 wickets.[4]
Victories by sides following-on[edit]
Test matches[edit]
There have been only three occasions in Test cricket where a team that was forced to follow-on won the match. Incidentally, Australia lost all three matches.
1894–95 Ashes[edit]
In the first innings of the First Test at Sydney, Australia had scored a massive 586 (Syd Gregory 201, George Giffen 161) and then dismissed England for 325. England responded with 437, leaving them ahead by 176. However, at stumps on the fourth day, Australia were 113 for 2 and looked to be the winners. But heavy rain fell overnight (in this era, pitches were not covered between days of play), and next morning England's slow left-arm bowlers, Bobby Peel and Johnny Briggs, were all but unplayable. England dismissed Australia for 166, winning by 10 runs,[5] and went on to win the series 3–2.
Botham's Test: England v Australia, Headingley, 1981[edit]
In 1981, England's Ian Botham was performing poorly as captain against the touring Australians. The Australian team was rated as second only to the great West Indies team of the time, and contained a formidable pace attack in the form of Dennis Lillee, Terry Alderman and Geoff Lawson. After a loss and a draw in the first two Test matches of the summer's six-test Ashes series, Botham resigned the captaincy.
Mike Brearley, the captain Botham had replaced, resumed the reins for the third Test, at Headingley. This started out very badly: Australia scored 401 (John Dyson 102; Kim Hughes 89; but Botham took 6–95), and asked England to follow on after bowling them out for 174 (Lillee took 4–49; Lawson 3–32). The one bright point in the innings came from Botham, who top scored with 50 (his first since he had been made captain 13 matches earlier). In the second innings, Botham came to the crease with England on 105 for 5, still 126 behind. Matters did not improve: Geoffrey Boycott and Bob Taylor soon followed, and with England 135 for 7 and still 92 runs behind an innings defeat looked likely.
By all accounts, everyone on both sides thought the game was lost. Ladbrokes famously offered 500–1 against England winning the Headingley Test. When Graham Dilley joined him at the crease, Botham reportedly said, 'Right then, let's have a bit of fun.' Botham, with able support from the lower order, went on to make 149 not out, and gave England a slender lead of 129. The next day a fired-up Bob Willis took 8 for 43, and Australia slumped to 111 all out.[6]
India v Australia, Eden Gardens, 2001[edit]
Australia, who had won their 16 previous Test matches, including the first of the three-Test series between the two teams,[7] had scored 445 in the first innings of the second Test and restricted India to 171; only V. V. S. Laxman (59) and Rahul Dravid reached 25 runs. The only other bright spot for India was the bowling of Harbhajan Singh, who took 7 for 123, including a hat-trick (Ricky Ponting, Adam Gilchrist, Shane Warne). Australia then enforced the follow-on.
Laxman came to the crease just before the end of Day 3 and proceeded to change the course of both the match and the series by hitting 281, at that time the record for an Indian Test batsman. He did most of his damage partnered with Dravid, who hit 180; the two were at the crease for the entire fourth day. India progressed to 657/7 in their second innings (a lead of 383), declared shortly before lunch on the final day (giving Australia insufficient time to reach the total, thus securing at least a draw). By tea, Australia had scored 161/3, and a draw appeared the most likely result. Then, within minutes, Australia lost five wickets for 8 runs in a span of 31 balls. Harbhajan took the first two wickets in the same over, followed quickly by three wickets from Sachin Tendulkar. Australia proceeded to fall for 212 in the second innings and India won the match. Despite Harbhajan's prodigious bowling—6 for 73 to go with his seven-wicket haul from the first innings—Laxman was named man of the match.[8] India's 171-run victory was by far the largest of the three Test victories by the team following on (both of England's winning margins had been fewer than 20 runs), and it was the only time in history that a side has been able to declare the follow-on innings and still win. India under the captaincy of Sourav Ganguly went on to win the 3rd test, and hence the series, with Laxman contributing half-centuries in both innings and Harbhajan, who was named as man of the series for taking 32 wickets.[9]
First-class matches[edit]
County Championship – Warwickshire v Hampshire, 1922[edit]
In 1922 at Edgbaston, Hampshire were bowled out for 15 in just nine overs in reply to Warwickshire's 223 in a 3-day match. Hampshire's total is the seventh-lowest score for a completed first-class innings. Hampshire were put back in to bat, and then famously scored a mammoth 521 before dismissing Warwickshire for 158 to win by a comfortable 155 runs.[10] Hampshire's first innings total of 15 remains the lowest score for a completed innings by a winning team.
History[edit]
- 1744: No provision.
- 1787: First known instance; at that time, it was the custom for a side behind on 1st innings to follow-on no matter what the deficit.
- 1835: Compulsory after a deficit of 100 runs.
- 1854: Compulsory after a deficit of 80 runs.
- 1894: Compulsory after a deficit of 120 runs.
- 1900: Made optional, after a deficit of 150 runs in a 3-day match, 100 runs in a 2-day match, and 75 runs in a one-day match.
- 1946: Experimental law allowed declaration on the first day after batting side had scored 300.
- 1951: A side could declare at any time.
- 1957: Above made law. Declarations were not to be made as a result of agreement with the opposing captain.
- 1961: In abeyance in County Championship, but restored in 1963.[11]
- 1980: In the new laws, optional after a deficit of 200 runs in a 5-day match, 150 runs in a 3- or 4-day match, 100 runs in a 2-day match and 75 runs in a 1-day match.
In other sports[edit]
Some informal baseball games use variations of the follow-on. [12]
Bibliography[edit]
- Birley, Derek (1999). A Social History of English Cricket. London: Aurum Press. ISBN1-85410-941-3.
- Brodribb, Gerald (1995). Next Man In: A Survey of Cricket Laws and Customs. London: Souvenir Press. ISBN0-285-63294-9.
References[edit]
- ^'Law 14 – The follow-on'. Lord's. Archived from the original on 22 June 2018. Retrieved 13 May 2018.
- ^Brearley, M. The Art of Captaincy. Macmillan, 1988, p.212
- ^'1st Test, Pakistan tour of West Indies at Bridgetown, Jan 17–23 1958'. ESPNcricinfo. Archived from the original on 2 April 2018. Retrieved 31 March 2018.
- ^'Archived copy'. Archived from the original on 11 December 2013. Retrieved 8 December 2013.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
- ^'1st Test, England tour of Australia at Sydney, Dec 14–20 1894'. ESPNcricinfo. Archived from the original on 31 March 2018. Retrieved 31 March 2018.
- ^'3rd Test, Australia tour of England at Leeds, Jul 16–21 1981'. ESPNcricinfo. Archived from the original on 31 March 2018. Retrieved 31 March 2018.
- ^'1st Test, Australia tour of India at Mumbai, Feb 27 – Mar 1 2001'. ESPNcricinfo. Archived from the original on 10 May 2019. Retrieved 31 March 2018.
- ^'2nd Test, Australia tour of India at Kolkata, Mar 11–15 2001'. ESPNcricinfo. Archived from the original on 26 June 2019. Retrieved 31 March 2018.
- ^'3rd Test, Australia tour of India at Chennai, Mar 18–22 2001'. ESPNcricinfo. Archived from the original on 9 May 2019. Retrieved 31 March 2018.
- ^'County Championship at Birmingham, Jun 14–16 1922'. ESPNcricinfo. Archived from the original on 31 March 2018. Retrieved 31 March 2018.
- ^1966 edition of Wisden Cricketer's Almanack, p153.
- ^'A cricket rule could help MLB shorten some games'. For The Win. 2 August 2018. Retrieved 8 September 2020.
Retrieved from 'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Follow-on&oldid=1008265127'
Ladbrokes is a name that stands out in the gambling industry because it has been around for so long; in fact, this gambling operator was established in 1886 and you are not going to find anyone else in the online casino industry who can say that. This impressive company's online casino began taking bets in the year 2000 since there was no Internet back in 1886! Because of its remarkable history, Ladbrokes Casino is well respected and trusted by players in the UK and abroad, making it a truly fine choice for anyone who wants to play gambling games with real money. When players choose to join this gambling site, they know that they are going to get high-quality gaming options and at least one of many brilliant Ladbrokes Casino promo codes such as a no deposit bonus.
Bonuses that truly Stand Out at Ladbrokes Casino
The benefits that both online casinos and players get from promotions are quite significant. Players get free spins, free cash, and more in order to enjoy the excitement of playing their favourite gambling games and a much better chance to walk away with money if lady luck is on their side. Gambling establishments get to attract more players and keep them as loyal players if the people in question like what they find.
Getting a brilliant bonus (with or without codes or coupons) when you first sign up on a gambling site is a great incentive that people look for and online casinos know that. Being a leader in the industry, Ladbrokes Casino is not a company that is often left behind so you can count on them to offer players some of the best promotions around, including no deposit bonuses.
Types of No Deposit Bonuses
A typical casino promotional code requires players to deposit at least a certain amount of money and rewards them with a percentage of the deposit in return; for example, if you were to use a code or coupon to accept a first deposit promo with a 200% bonus up to £1,000, you might choose to deposit £500 and that means that you will get £1,000 on top of that for a total of £1,500. You will notice that most online casino bonus coupons are this straightforward. Of course, Ladbrokes Casino and other gambling sites employ other types of promotions and a lot of them do not even require a deposit.
If you have never accepted a no deposit bonus code or coupon from an online casino before, you are probably wondering what it is exactly and what you can expect from it. This gambling site offers many types of promotions for new and loyal players alike on a regular basis and some of those do not require a deposit of any kind. Here are a few examples of Ladbrokes Casino no deposit promos you can expect to come across:
- No Deposit Free Spins: The most common type of promo that does not require a deposit is one that comes with free spins. Accepting one of these types of promotions is a great way to start playing slots at Ladbrokes Casino and get to know what you can expect from them. Sometimes, these promos will come with spins that can be used with most slots and at other times with spins that are meant to be used with a specific slot game.
- Cash Without a Deposit: Another type of Ladbrokes Casino no deposit bonus that is available from time to time is one that comes with a small amount of cash for players to get started betting on their favourite types of casino games and not just slots. This type of promo is great for people who want more betting options unless it is tied to a specific game.
- Promo with Spins and Cash: The management team at this gambling site is very creative and they often put together promos that include both free spins and a certain amount of cash in order to attract players who want to play both slots and table games, for instance.
Ladbrokes Casino No Deposit Bonus Code
There is no doubt that one of the most attractive types of casino promos that players often look for is a no deposit bonus. These types of promotions allow players to try out a gambling site's games without having to put any money on the line and that is quite beneficial for them. Ladbrokes Casino is not currently offering a no deposit bonus but does add such promotions from time to time with and without codes or coupons. However, they do currently have a welcome promotion that requires a mere £10 deposit so that makes it very accessible to any player who is interested in playing casino games with real money.
Ladbrokes Spin To Win Real Money
Ladbrokes Casino Welcome Bonus without a Code
Ladbrokes Spin To Win Prizes
Players are used to being welcomed at online casinos that are new to them with a good bonus code or coupon that give them a bigger bankroll to play with. The promo that players will get here when they first deposit includes £50 for a deposit of just £10; although this is not the very best type of welcome bonus that this gambling site has ever offered, it is a nice amount of free money to play with and that should please any player! What makes this promo a great choice for new players is that they can start playing some of Ladbroke's incredible games for just £10 to see how they like them and hopefully get good winnings as well. Imagine if you make a considerable deposit at an online casino only to realize that you do not like what they have to offer; well, that is not going to happen here since you can start your journey with Ladbrokes Casino for a mere £10.
Things to Know
You might accept a promotion with or without a coupon or code that happens to be a Ladbrokes Casino no deposit bonus, but no matter what type of promo gets your attention, you should always know what you are getting into. Here are some of the things that you should know about this online casino's welcome bonus:
- You must gamble your £10 deposit: Getting £50 for a £10 deposit is definitely great but one of the terms of this promo states that you must also wager the £10 that you deposit on qualifying casino, slots, or live casino games.
- Ladbrokes Casino wagering requirements: You should always be aware of the wagering requirements associated with any bonus that you accept either from this or other gambling establishments. The welcome promo at this gambling site has a 40x wagering requirement which is not low but not as high as others that we have seen.
- You get 7 days to accept your welcome bonus: By signing up at this gambling site, you will become eligible for your welcome bonus; but that does mean that you have to accept it right away since you get a total of 7 days to do so. You also have various options to accept this promotion such as through your inbox, a pop-up, or the site's promo hub.
- Deposit methods matter: Something that is very important to keep in mind is that certain deposit methods are excluded when it comes to this welcome bonus. If you deposit via PaypalEnvoy, Skrill, Neteller, Paysafe, Moneybookers, prepaid and certain debit cards, you will not be eligible for this promotion.
£2 Million Cash Giveaway
Ladbrokes Casino does not only offer no deposit and small deposit promo codes or coupons to attract new players but often has others as well. Currently, this gambling site has an incredible £2 Million Cash Giveaway promotion where 4,000 prizes are given away weekly. Top prizes include $5,000 and that goes up to $10,000 on special weeks that take place every 10 weeks. This is definitely a promotion that all players at this incredible gambling site should take advantage of. No code is required to enjoy this offer; the only thing that players have to do in order to qualify for this outstanding promotion is play selected Jackpot King Slots. Players will get an entry into the weekly draw for this promo for every £10 that they bet. The list of eligible games includes The Goonies Jackpot King, Ted Jackpot King, Gold Frenzy, Fishin Frenzy Jackpot King, King Kong Cash Jackpot King, Cop The Lot, Deal or No Deal Megaways Jackpot King, Tridentia, Slots O'Gold, Genie Jackpots, Worms Reloaded, Ave Caesar, Superspinner Bar-X, The Pig Wizard, and much more, ensuring that players have plenty of options to keep them entertained.
Free Daily Prizes
Once you start playing the brilliant games that Ladbrokes Casino has to offer, whether you find a no deposit bonus code or coupon or not, you will probably want to do so on a daily basis and that means that you will be able to win prizes every single day with their free-to-play game 'Instant Spins.' You get a free spin at this game every day and can win free slot spins, £100 cash prizes, and much more. No codes or coupons are necessary to play Instant Spins; all you have to do is log in daily and you are sure to get some nice prizes here and there. You can spin the wheel to try to win a prize between 00:00 (UK Time) and 23:59 (UK Time) every single day. Anything that you happen to win will be credited to your account immediately and will be valid for a full week so make sure to use it right away!